Reviewer Comments Reviewer Name* Reviewer Email* Paper ID* Paper Title* 01. Title Relevancy: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 02. Abstract Relevancy: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 03. Keywords Matching: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 04. Introduction Structure: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 05. Methodology Explanation: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 06. Result and Discussion: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 07. Conclusion: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 08. Originality: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 09. Presentation: ExcellentGoodFairMarginalPoor 10. Recommendation: Accept with no revisionAccept with minor revisionMajor revisionReject Comments to Authors (if any): Comments to the Editor (if any): Attach file (if any)